[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Fishbowl
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

67

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

94

across 537 prompts

AI Share of Voice

95%

across 521 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Inventory Management · of 92

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
426 category
Cited99%421/426
Share of voice94%avg
Engine consensus65%of engines
Competitors4.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Fishbowl is visible in

1
  • Inventory Management2 of 92→

Executive summary

Fishbowl is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has strong G2 presence (278 reviews) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., Fishbowl vs Oracle NetSuite) plus a publicly accessible, tiered pricing page. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data (and ensure it’s present on key product/pricing/comparison pages), because current live checks did not find SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating markers on the pricing page.

Based on audit of fishbowlinventory.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy