AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Digital Asset Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals14/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
18
across 164 prompts
AI Share of Voice
18%
across 164 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Asset Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Filecamp is visible in
1Executive summary
Filecamp shows strong AI citation readiness for evaluation-stage queries because it has an active G2 presence (36 reviews, 4.7 rating) and publicly crawlable pricing with clear tiers ($29/$59/$89 per month). The biggest risk for AI engines is conversion-stage and structured evaluation queries that require first-party, schema-rich product/pricing context (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating), which could be missing or not easily discoverable from search.
Based on audit of filecamp.com · Oct 7, 2026