AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Education & LMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
89
across 34 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 26 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Education & LMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Ex Libris is strongly cited for evaluation-stage shortlist queries via G2 (Alma has 23 reviews at 3.3★ on G2) and first-party G2 comparison surfaces exist for competitor evaluation. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party Ex Libris comparison pages and evaluation FAQs that directly answer the exact prompts (especially the Sierra ILS and SirsiDynix Symphony comparison queries) so AI engines can cite exlibrisgroup.com for evaluation, not only third-party pages.
Based on audit of exlibrisgroup.com · Aug 29, 2026