[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Ease
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

18

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

28

across 141 prompts

AI Share of Voice

28%

across 141 prompts

Category Visibility

#11

in Benefits Administration · of 72

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
73 brand-level
Cited23%17/73
Share of voice9%avg
Engine consensus37%of engines
Competitors19.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Ease is visible in

1
  • Benefits Administration12 of 72→

Executive summary

ease.com is a B2B SaaS brand (benefits administration/HR platform) and is already cited for evaluation queries via strong third-party review signals (e.g., G2 shows 201 reviews at 4.6/5). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” and “pricing” queries: pricing is publicly crawlable but heavily demo-gated, and there’s no clear evidence of first-party “Ease vs X” comparison pages or crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) from the live checks. Highest-ROI fix: publish/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation pages (brand-led “Ease vs [competitor]” and “Ease pricing” FAQ) with SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema and SSR/crawlability verification.

Based on audit of ease.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy