AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Education & LMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals34/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
38
across 15 prompts
AI Share of Voice
38%
across 15 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Education & LMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
acm.org is not a B2B SaaS product brand; it is the Association for Computing Machinery (a professional/scientific society). AI citation likelihood is therefore strongest for “what is ACM / who is ACM for / ACM conferences & publications” style queries, but weak for “best software / pricing / alternatives” evaluation patterns because there is no SaaS product, no G2/Capterra/TrustRadius/Gartner vendor profile signals, and the homepage is not crawlable from this environment (403). Highest-ROI fix: improve AI-crawlability of core pages (SSR/crawl access) and add structured Organization/FAQ-style content that matches common informational queries about ACM (not software buying).
Based on audit of acm.org · Aug 30, 2026