AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals69/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 266 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 250 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Eclipse Che is visible in
1Executive summary
Eclipse.org is highly likely to be cited for developer/IDE and open-source ecosystem queries (strong third-party review presence on G2/TrustRadius and strong LinkedIn authority), but it’s weaker for AI evaluation/conversion-style queries because it is not a typical B2B SaaS product with crawlable pricing, SoftwareApplication schema, and first-party evaluation pages. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand structured, crawlable product-style pages (clear “what it is / who it’s for / how to adopt” plus evaluation FAQs) for the specific Eclipse offerings that buyers search for (e.g., Eclipse IDE, Theia, Open VSX).
Based on audit of eclipse.org · Oct 9, 2026