[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Duo Security
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

98

across 216 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 200 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
164 category
Cited100%164/164
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited100%11/11
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Duo is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 review footprint (494 reviews, 4.6/5) and public, tiered pricing ($0/$3/$6/$9 per user/month). The biggest conversion-stage risk is missing/unclear first-party comparison and structured-data signals (no discoverable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/llms.txt evidence in live search), which can reduce citation for “Duo vs X” and “Duo pricing” evaluation prompts.

Based on audit of duo.com · Jun 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy