[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Duck Creek Policy
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

54

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

16

across 184 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 168 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
162 category
Cited12%19/162
Share of voice8%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors3.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited60%3/5
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Duck Creek Policy is visible in

2
  • Insurance Tech12 of 20→
  • Billing & Invoicingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Duck Creek is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (151 total reviews across the seller page with a 4.6/5 rating) and meaningful enterprise credibility via Gartner Peer Insights (4.2/5 with 14 ratings in Finance market). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content for comparison/pricing-style queries (e.g., explicit “[Duck Creek] vs [competitor]” and crawlable pricing/packaging pages), since first-party comparison/pricing surfaces are currently not clearly discoverable from live search.

Based on audit of duckcreek.com · Jun 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy