[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/DeployHQ
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

12

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 149 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 149 prompts

Category Visibility

#40

in CI/CD · of 75

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Shortlist Position

2/80

Not Visible · Ci Cd Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
84 category
Cited8%7/84
Share of voice6%avg
Engine consensus50%of engines
Competitors16.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories DeployHQ is visible in

1
  • CI/CD41 of 75→

Your visibility gap

DeployHQ surfaces in 2/80 Ci Cd discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 78 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim DeployHQ →

Executive summary

DeployHQ is already well-positioned for AI citation in CI/CD-adjacent discovery (e.g., “CI/CD for marketing agencies” is cited by Claude/ChatGPT) and has strong third-party authority via G2 (63 reviews, 4.5/5). The biggest remaining citation risk is category-specific discovery gaps (e.g., “CI/CD for e-commerce platforms”, “CI/CD tools for manufacturing firms”, “best CI/CD software for startups”)—fix by publishing first-party, crawlable evaluation content that maps DeployHQ to those buyer contexts and by expanding structured evaluation pages (FAQ + SoftwareApplication-style schema).

Based on audit of deployhq.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy