AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in LLM Platforms
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
44
across 301 prompts
AI Share of Voice
44%
across 301 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
3/74
Not Visible · Llm Platforms Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in LLM Platforms
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
DeepSeek surfaces in 3/74 Llm Platforms discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 71 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
DeepSeek has strong B2B citation foundations via G2 (18 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party API pricing content that AI can read. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage evaluation queries that require first-party “[DeepSeek] vs ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini” and “alternatives to DeepSeek” pages—web search did not surface any first-party comparison pages on deepseek.com, so AI engines likely rely on third parties instead of citing DeepSeek directly.
Based on audit of deepseek.com · Oct 8, 2026