AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in AI Governance Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 14 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 14 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Governance Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories CVAT is visible in
1Executive summary
cvat.ai is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 presence (32 reviews, 4.6/5) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit per-user/per-month tiers and an enterprise starting price. The biggest risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “AI citation” reliability: there’s no clear evidence (from live checks) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and no first-party “[CVAT] vs [Competitor]” comparison pages found—so AI engines may rely on third parties instead of citing cvat.ai directly.
Based on audit of cvat.ai · Sep 1, 2026