[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/CubeAPM
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

10

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

10

across 166 prompts

AI Share of Voice

10%

across 166 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
82 brand-level
Cited1%1/82
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors17.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories CubeAPM is visible in

1
  • Observability & APMnot yet measured→

Executive summary

CubeAPM is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party, indexed comparison pages like “CubeAPM vs Datadog” and “CubeAPM vs New Relic,” plus a publicly accessible pricing page with explicit $0.15/GB tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings) and secondary authority signals (TrustRadius/Capterra/Gartner Peer Insights presence) so AI answers can cite CubeAPM more confidently for “best APM software” and “alternatives to CubeAPM” prompts.

Based on audit of cubeapm.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy