AI Visibility
measured23/100
Emerging · in Observability & APM
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals10/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 166 prompts
AI Share of Voice
10%
across 166 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Observability & APM
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories CubeAPM is visible in
1Executive summary
CubeAPM is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party, indexed comparison pages like “CubeAPM vs Datadog” and “CubeAPM vs New Relic,” plus a publicly accessible pricing page with explicit $0.15/GB tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings) and secondary authority signals (TrustRadius/Capterra/Gartner Peer Insights presence) so AI answers can cite CubeAPM more confidently for “best APM software” and “alternatives to CubeAPM” prompts.
Based on audit of cubeapm.com · May 6, 2026