AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Subscription Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 322 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 322 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Subscription Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Cratejoy is visible in
2Executive summary
Cratejoy is likely to be cited more for consumer subscription-box discovery than for B2B software evaluation queries, and its AI citation risk is highest for evaluation-stage prompts like "Cratejoy pricing" and "Cratejoy vs [competitor]" where AI expects crawlable SaaS pricing/comparison content. The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure Cratejoy’s seller-platform pages (pricing + evaluation content) are fully crawlable/SSR and supported by evaluation-focused structured data (FAQPage/Product/Organization), so AI can cite first-party explanations instead of relying on third-party review sites.
Based on audit of cratejoy.com · Aug 30, 2026