[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/CoSchedule Social Calendar
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

64

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 195 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 187 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
184 category
Cited8%15/184
Share of voice5%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors8.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
3 brand-level
Cited100%3/3
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
2 brand-level
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice84%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories CoSchedule Social Calendar is visible in

2
  • Content Marketing59 of 191→
  • Social Media Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

CoSchedule is highly likely to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review authority on G2 (78 reviews shown on G2) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-user/month tiers. The biggest AI-citation risk is Structured Data/Technical AEO for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating not clearly discoverable via search) and the lack of clearly indexed first-party comparison pages specifically for the exact competitor set (Sprout Social, Hootsuite, Buffer, Loomly, Agorapulse) beyond at least one Sprout Social comparison page.

Based on audit of coschedule.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy