AI Visibility
measured61/100
Frequently Cited · in Content Marketing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals64/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
99
across 286 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 278 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content Marketing
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
CoSchedule is highly likely to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review authority on G2 (78 reviews shown on G2) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-user/month tiers. The biggest AI-citation risk is Structured Data/Technical AEO for B2B evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating not clearly discoverable via search) and the lack of clearly indexed first-party comparison pages specifically for the exact competitor set (Sprout Social, Hootsuite, Buffer, Loomly, Agorapulse) beyond at least one Sprout Social comparison page.
Based on audit of coschedule.com · May 7, 2026