AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 164 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 164 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Coohom is visible in
2Executive summary
Coohom is already strongly citeable for evaluation-stage “best [category] software” queries because it has a G2 profile with 140 reviews and a 4.4/5 rating plus a Grid® leader badge. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces (especially brand-led “Coohom vs X” pages and SoftwareApplication/Offer structured data on product/pricing pages) so AI engines can cite Coohom directly for comparison and pricing prompts.
Based on audit of coohom.com · Sep 1, 2026