[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/ContractSafe
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

13

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

19

across 155 prompts

AI Share of Voice

19%

across 155 prompts

Category Visibility

#20

in Contract Lifecycle Management · of 60

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
86 category
Cited26%22/86
Share of voice14%avg
Engine consensus37%of engines
Competitors21.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories ContractSafe is visible in

1
  • Contract Lifecycle Management20 of 60→

Executive summary

ContractSafe is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (G2 + Capterra) and first-party, brand-led comparison pages (e.g., ContractSafe vs ContractWorks) with published pricing starting at $450/month. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + technical AEO for evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure AI crawlers can reliably extract it—this is what most often prevents brands from being selected in “best/alternatives/pricing” AI shortlists even when reviews exist.

Based on audit of contractsafe.com · May 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy