AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in Contract Lifecycle Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals13/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
23
across 159 prompts
AI Share of Voice
23%
across 159 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Contract Lifecycle Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories ContractSafe is visible in
1Executive summary
ContractSafe is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (G2 + Capterra) and first-party, brand-led comparison pages (e.g., ContractSafe vs ContractWorks) with published pricing starting at $450/month. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + technical AEO for evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensure AI crawlers can reliably extract it—this is what most often prevents brands from being selected in “best/alternatives/pricing” AI shortlists even when reviews exist.
Based on audit of contractsafe.com · May 8, 2026