[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/ContentStudio
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

11

across 329 prompts

AI Share of Voice

11%

across 329 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
196 category
Cited13%25/196
Share of voice11%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors5.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories ContentStudio is visible in

2
  • Content Marketingnot yet measured→
  • Social Media Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

ContentStudio is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (352 reviews, 4.6/5) and clear, tiered pricing information. The highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen B2B-specific structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) and ensure crawlable first-party evaluation pages (especially brand-led “vs/alternatives” pages) so AI engines can cite ContentStudio directly for comparison and pricing questions.

Based on audit of contentstudio.io · May 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy