AI Visibility
measured68/100
Frequently Cited · in Expense Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals74/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
99
across 359 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 343 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Expense Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
concur.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has very strong third-party review authority (G2: 6,966 reviews at 4.0/5; TrustRadius: 2,039 reviews with 8.4/10) and clear first-party evaluation content (e.g., a first-party “SAP Concur vs Expensify” page). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Technical AEO for AI crawlers on pricing and structured evaluation content (ensure pricing is fully crawlable/SSR and add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema on the most evaluation-intent pages).
Based on audit of concur.com · May 7, 2026