AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in GRC Platforms
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 161 prompts
AI Share of Voice
11%
across 161 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in GRC Platforms
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Compyl is visible in
1Executive summary
Compyl is already well-positioned for AI citation on evaluation and conversion queries because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., Compyl vs Vanta) and a publicly crawlable pricing page. The biggest remaining risk for AI “best/alternatives” shortlist queries is missing/unclear secondary review + structured-data signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating) and limited evidence of broad third-party ecosystem listings (e.g., Salesforce/HubSpot/Zapier/AppSource).
Based on audit of compyl.com · Oct 4, 2026