AI Visibility
measured8/100
Invisible · in Security
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals34/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 12 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 12 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Security
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Codebashing is visible in
1Executive summary
AI citation readiness for Codebashing is weak primarily because it has extremely low G2 review volume (2 reviews, 4.3/5) and no clearly crawlable first-party pricing/comparison surfaces. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish SSR-crawlable evaluation content (pricing + “Codebashing vs X” pages) and ensure SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data so models can cite it for evaluation and conversion queries.
Based on audit of codebashing.com · May 20, 2026