AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals76/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
87
across 38 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 22 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Cockroach Labs is already well-positioned for AI citations in evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party comparison content (e.g., CockroachDB vs Amazon Aurora) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest remaining risk is Technical AEO: robots.txt is permissive for GPTBot/ClaudeBot/PerplexityBot, but llms.txt could not be verified and SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data could not be confirmed—so AI engines may under-cite conversion/evaluation details.
Based on audit of cockroachlabs.com · Aug 29, 2026