AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in LLM Hosting
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals74/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
88
across 38 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 22 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in LLM Hosting
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Cloudflare is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., G2 seller page shows 801 reviews for “Cloudflare Application Security and Performance”). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/sellers/cloudflare-inc?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure first-party, brand-led evaluation surfaces exist and are crawlable for “Cloudflare vs [competitor]” and “Cloudflare pricing” patterns (so AI can cite Cloudflare directly rather than only third parties).
Based on audit of cloudflare.com · Oct 25, 2026