[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
[unCited]/Clio
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

76

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

76

across 16 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
3 prompts
Cited100%3/3
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
5 prompts
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 prompts
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 prompts
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Clio is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “best legal practice management software” and “Clio vs [competitor]” because it has strong G2 review volume (993 reviews, 4.6/5 on G2 for Clio Manage) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., /compare/ and /compare/clio-vs-*.html). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Product+Offer) and confirm crawlability/SSR for the most important evaluation pages, since schema evidence was not found in live checks.

Based on audit of clio.com · May 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy