AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Container Orchestration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals12/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
14
across 162 prompts
AI Share of Voice
14%
across 162 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
3/66
Not Visible · Container Orchestration Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Container Orchestration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Civo is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Civo surfaces in 3/66 Container Orchestration discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 63 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Civo is already cited for mid-funnel evaluation patterns like “managed Kubernetes with backup solutions” and “managed Kubernetes for startups,” but it is missing from high-intent evaluation/discovery gaps such as “managed Kubernetes services comparison” and “Kubernetes for production deployments.” The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation pages that directly answer the gap queries (especially comparison + production + multi-cloud + GitOps + autoscaling + service mesh), then wire them with SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema so AI engines can extract and cite them.
Based on audit of civo.com · May 6, 2026