AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in DevOps Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals71/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
85
across 497 prompts
AI Share of Voice
86%
across 479 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in DevOps Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Circleci is visible in
2Executive summary
CircleCI is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for CI/CD evaluation queries because it has strong third-party authority (500+ G2 reviews at 4.4★) and first-party comparison content (e.g., GitHub Actions vs CircleCI, Jenkins vs CircleCI). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure evaluation-intent pages (especially pricing + comparison pages for GitHub Actions/GitLab CI/CD/Jenkins/Buildkite/Harness) expose consistent, crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) so AI can confidently answer “best/alternatives/cost” prompts without relying on third parties.
Based on audit of circleci.com · Apr 2, 2026