[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Circleci
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

88

across 612 prompts

AI Share of Voice

89%

across 594 prompts

Category Visibility

#6

in DevOps Automation · of 92

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
417 category
Cited98%410/417
Share of voice91%avg
Engine consensus61%of engines
Competitors5.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
10 brand-level
Cited80%8/10
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Circleci is visible in

2
  • CI/CD2 of 89→
  • DevOps Automation4 of 92→

Executive summary

CircleCI is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for CI/CD evaluation queries because it has strong third-party authority (500+ G2 reviews at 4.4★) and first-party comparison content (e.g., GitHub Actions vs CircleCI, Jenkins vs CircleCI). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure evaluation-intent pages (especially pricing + comparison pages for GitHub Actions/GitLab CI/CD/Jenkins/Buildkite/Harness) expose consistent, crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) so AI can confidently answer “best/alternatives/cost” prompts without relying on third parties.

Based on audit of circleci.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy