AI Visibility
measured67/100
Frequently Cited · in Payment Processing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals31/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
52
across 259 prompts
AI Share of Voice
52%
across 259 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
26/80
Challenger · Payment Processing Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Payment Processing
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories checkout.com is visible in
1Your visibility gap
checkout.com surfaces in 26/80 Payment Processing discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 54 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Checkout.com is already well-positioned for AI citation in discovery queries around general payment processing and security (e.g., “best payment processing software for startups” and “how to manage online payments securely”), largely supported by strong G2 presence (4.6/5 with 70 reviews on G2). The highest-ROI fix is to add crawlable, first-party evaluation content that directly answers the missing use-case prompts (subscriptions, retail, nonprofits, restaurant efficiency, freelancer billing, CFO/cash-flow, and daily operations) and to ensure pricing + product/application structured data are fully machine-readable for evaluation-stage queries.
Based on audit of checkout.com · May 7, 2026