AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in IT & Service Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 317 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 317 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in IT & Service Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Checkmk is visible in
2Executive summary
checkmk.com is already highly citeable for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (306 reviews, 4.7/5) and active third-party review coverage plus a publicly accessible pricing page with tiered self-hosted options. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison and evaluation content that is explicitly structured for AI (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage + indexed “[Checkmk] vs [Competitor]” pages), because that’s the main conversion-stage citation gap for “alternatives to Checkmk” and “Checkmk vs …” prompts.
Based on audit of checkmk.com · Sep 1, 2026