AI Visibility
measured54/100
Frequently Cited · in Product Experience
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
26
across 204 prompts
AI Share of Voice
28%
across 186 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Product Experience
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Chameleon is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (349 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., Chameleon vs Appcues, Chameleon vs Userpilot). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure pricing + comparison pages expose enough machine-readable detail for “How much does Chameleon cost?” and “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” query patterns.
Based on audit of chameleon.io · Apr 2, 2026