AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
49
across 276 prompts
AI Share of Voice
49%
across 276 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Captivate.fm is visible in
1Executive summary
Captivate.fm is already well-positioned for AI citation on evaluation and conversion prompts because it has a strong G2 presence (13 reviews, 4.5★) and first-party comparison content like “Buzzsprout vs Captivate” and “Transistor vs Captivate.” The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation for “How much does Captivate.fm cost?” and evaluation-stage citation for multi-competitor alternatives prompts—fix by ensuring a crawlable, tiered pricing page and adding first-party pages that explicitly cover the exact competitor set (Buzzsprout, Podbean, Transistor, Libsyn, RSS.com).
Based on audit of captivate.fm · Oct 9, 2026