AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Third-Party Risk Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals40/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 179 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 169 prompts
Critical Issues
7
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Grc Platforms Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Third-Party Risk Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories C1Risk is visible in
2Your visibility gap
C1Risk surfaces in 0/80 Grc Platforms discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
C1Risk has meaningful B2B citation signals (G2 profile exists with 14 reviews and a 4.7/5 rating, plus Capterra shows 23 reviews at 4.9/5), but it is missing key AI-evaluation surfaces for “solo/agency-of-one/small org” shortlist queries. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation pages that explicitly answer the gap queries (solo practitioner, agency of one, small teams, early-stage startups) with pricing/fit blocks and FAQ-style Q&A.
Based on audit of c1risk.com · Aug 31, 2026