[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Bynder Webdam
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

68

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

5

across 345 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 329 prompts

Category Visibility

#48

in Digital Asset Management · of 113

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
330 category
Cited3%9/330
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors2.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice93%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Bynder Webdam is visible in

2
  • Digital Asset Management47 of 113→
  • Content & Knowledge223 of 336→

Executive summary

Bynder is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 and TrustRadius) and visible enterprise analyst positioning (Forrester Wave mention on its site). The single highest-ROI fix is to add first-party, brand-led comparison and evaluation pages (e.g., “Bynder vs [top DAM alternatives]”) plus SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data so AI can cite Bynder directly for “vs/alternatives/pricing” queries rather than relying on third parties.

Based on audit of bynder.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy