AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in Vulnerability Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals34/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
46
across 228 prompts
AI Share of Voice
46%
across 228 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
27/80
Challenger · Vulnerability Management Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vulnerability Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Burp Suite is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Burp Suite surfaces in 27/80 Vulnerability Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 53 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
PortSwigger is already cited for vulnerability-management discovery queries (e.g., prioritization and improving detection) and has strong G2 visibility (129 reviews, 4.8/5, Grid leader). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation/conversion coverage for vulnerability-management software queries (especially compliance/risk assessment and cloud/DevOps use cases) because first-party “how it works” and “software” framing is not aligned to those buyer questions.
Based on audit of portswigger.net · May 28, 2026