[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Browser Use
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 176 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 176 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Shortlist Position

4/80

Not Visible · Browser Automation Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
106 category
Cited8%8/106
Share of voice4%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors19.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Browser Use is visible in

1
  • Browser Automationnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Browser Use surfaces in 4/80 Browser Automation discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 76 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Browser Use →

Executive summary

Browser-use.com is already cited by AI for browser automation use cases (e.g., content publishing and e-commerce workflows), but it is weak for evaluation-style “what do engineers/devs use for testing/scraping/lead gen” queries. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable use-case pages that directly answer the missing gap queries (testing, scraping, lead gen, scheduling, ticketing, compliance) with concrete workflows and outcomes.

Based on audit of browser-use.com · May 21, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy