AI Visibility
measured12/100
Emerging · in Browser Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 176 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 176 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
4/80
Not Visible · Browser Automation Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Browser Automation
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Browser Use is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Browser Use surfaces in 4/80 Browser Automation discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 76 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Browser-use.com is already cited by AI for browser automation use cases (e.g., content publishing and e-commerce workflows), but it is weak for evaluation-style “what do engineers/devs use for testing/scraping/lead gen” queries. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable use-case pages that directly answer the missing gap queries (testing, scraping, lead gen, scheduling, ticketing, compliance) with concrete workflows and outcomes.
Based on audit of browser-use.com · May 21, 2026