[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Blender
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

11

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

30

across 371 prompts

AI Share of Voice

30%

across 371 prompts

Category Visibility

#3

in 3D & CAD · of 123

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Shortlist Position

9/79

Niche · 3d Cad Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
230 category
Cited32%73/230
Share of voice27%avg
Engine consensus53%of engines
Competitors12.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Blender is visible in

2
  • 3D & CAD3 of 123→
  • Video Editingnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Blender surfaces in 9/79 3d Cad discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 70 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Blender →

Executive summary

Blender.org is strongly cited for general 3D visualization/animation and workflow questions, but it is weakly positioned for B2B-style evaluation queries like “3D & CAD software for manufacturing industries” and “best CAD software for small businesses.” The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, evaluation-intent pages that explicitly map Blender to manufacturing/engineering workflows (use-case + ROI + comparison-style FAQs) so AI can cite first-party answers for those missing discovery queries.

Based on audit of blender.org · May 22, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy