AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Video Editing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 315 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 315 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Video Editing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Biteable is visible in
2Executive summary
Biteable is already meaningfully cited for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (26 reviews, 4.4/5 on the G2 reviews page) and it has crawlable, tiered pricing on its own site. The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” coverage: while Biteable has first-party comparison navigation (e.g., “Biteable vs Canva/Clipchamp/InVideo/Synthesia/Veed”), there’s no evidence in live search that it has SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data or that its comparison pages are indexed in a way AI engines can reliably extract for “vs” answers.
Based on audit of biteable.com · Oct 6, 2026