[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Bill
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

74

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

29

across 644 prompts

AI Share of Voice

28%

across 627 prompts

Category Visibility

#5

in Spend Management · of 97

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
398 category
Cited62%247/398
Share of voice30%avg
Engine consensus48%of engines
Competitors30.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
10 brand-level
Cited100%10/10
Share of voice97%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Bill is visible in

3
  • Billing & Invoicing4 of 115→
  • Finance4 of 139→
  • Spend Management5 of 97→

Executive summary

bill.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has very strong G2 presence (multiple BILL product lines with thousands of reviews) and first-party comparison infrastructure (a /compare hub plus multiple “Bill vs X” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data coverage for evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) so AI engines can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing / integrations” directly from bill.com pages rather than falling back to third-party review sites.

Based on audit of bill.com · Jun 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy