AI Visibility
measured69/100
Frequently Cited · in Spend Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals68/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
54
across 997 prompts
AI Share of Voice
54%
across 981 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Spend Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
bill.com is a strong B2B SaaS citation candidate for evaluation and conversion queries because it has a public, tiered pricing page and first-party comparison content (e.g., BILL vs Tipalti) plus high review volume on G2. The biggest AI citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO validation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) and ensuring evaluation-page crawlability at scale—fixing this should improve appearance in “BILL vs X” and “BILL pricing” answers.
Based on audit of bill.com · Jun 28, 2026