AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in Device Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals55/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
31
across 180 prompts
AI Share of Voice
31%
across 180 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Device Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Asset Panda is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a meaningful G2 presence (42 reviews, ~4.2/5) and first-party comparison content (e.g., “Asset Panda vs Sortly” and a /compare/ hub). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + conversion-page crawlability for pricing/evaluation (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating), because pricing is split across a public quote page and a Pro knowledge-base pricing article rather than a single crawlable pricing surface.
Based on audit of assetpanda.com · Jun 4, 2026