[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/ArkCase
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 137 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 137 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/54

Not Visible · Public Sector Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
71 brand-level
Cited0%0/71
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories ArkCase is visible in

1
  • Government & Public Sectornot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

ArkCase surfaces in 0/54 Public Sector discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 54 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim ArkCase →

Executive summary

ArkCase has strong conversion-intent signals (public pricing with a $60*/user/month tier and a clear legal/public-sector positioning), but it is likely under-cited for evaluation queries because it lacks first-party “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages and likely lacks B2B structured-data patterns (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) that AI engines use for direct answers. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party comparison pages that explicitly answer “How does ArkCase compare to Clio Manage?” and “How does ArkCase compare to Everlaw?” with ArkCase-led recommendations and crawlable content.

Based on audit of arkcase.com · Jun 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy