[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Archdesk
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

3

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

20

across 142 prompts

AI Share of Voice

20%

across 142 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
67 category
Cited6%4/67
Share of voice6%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Archdesk is visible in

1
  • Construction Softwarenot yet measured→

Executive summary

Archdesk is already well-positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (21 reviews, 4.3★) and publicly accessible pricing with tiered starting prices. The biggest risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “self-citation” gaps: the site appears to lack crawlable first-party structured evaluation assets (notably SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/LLMS.txt/robots.txt verification) and first-party comparison pages that directly answer the exact competitor comparison prompts.

Based on audit of archdesk.com · Jun 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy