[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
[unCited]/Appliedsystems
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

55

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

55

across 16 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
no prompts at this stage
—
⚖️Evaluation
8 prompts
Cited25%2/8
Share of voice25%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 prompts
Cited50%2/4
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 prompts
Cited0%0/4
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Applied Systems is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (1,652 reviews, 4.4/5, Grid Leader) and an active LinkedIn company authority signal (51,061 followers). The biggest citation risk is evaluation queries that require first-party, crawlable comparison/pricing content (e.g., “[Applied Systems] vs [competitor]” and “Applied Systems pricing”); the site appears to rely heavily on contact-gated flows and lacks easily discoverable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured-data signals in public search results.

Based on audit of appliedsystems.com · May 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy