[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Appliedsystems
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

55

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

64

across 20 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 4 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
4 category
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited25%1/4
Share of voice25%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Applied Systems is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (1,652 reviews, 4.4/5, Grid Leader) and an active LinkedIn company authority signal (51,061 followers). The biggest citation risk is evaluation queries that require first-party, crawlable comparison/pricing content (e.g., “[Applied Systems] vs [competitor]” and “Applied Systems pricing”); the site appears to rely heavily on contact-gated flows and lacks easily discoverable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured-data signals in public search results.

Based on audit of appliedsystems.com · May 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy