AI Visibility
measured70/100
Frequently Cited · in LLM Platforms
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals64/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
48
across 138 prompts
AI Share of Voice
45%
across 122 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in LLM Platforms
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Anthropic is visible in
1Executive summary
Anthropic is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong first-party pricing (public tiers) and dense, outcome-based customer case studies. The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage and structured-data completeness (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) on key pages—without those, AI engines may rely more on third-party sources instead of citing anthropic.com for “Claude vs X” and “Claude pricing” style answers.
Based on audit of anthropic.com · May 8, 2026