AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in AI Applications
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals38/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 13 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 13 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Applications
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
AIVA is currently unlikely to be cited as “best AI music generation software” in B2B-style evaluation answers because its G2 presence is extremely thin (2 reviews, 4.0 rating) and there are no clearly indexed first-party comparison/evaluation surfaces on aiva.ai for competitor-specific queries. Highest-ROI fix: publish crawlable, first-party evaluation content that directly targets the exact query patterns (especially “How does AIVA compare to Suno?” / “How does AIVA compare to Udio?”) and ensure it’s SSR-indexable with structured Q&A (FAQPage) and product/pricing schema.
Based on audit of aiva.ai · Oct 16, 2026