AI Visibility
measured21/100
Emerging · in Audit & SOX
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals57/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
68
across 23 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 6 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Audit & SOX
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Thomson Reuters is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence on G2 (e.g., 812 reviews for CS Professional Suite and 807 reviews for Thomson Reuters products page) and active enterprise social authority via LinkedIn (1.9M+ followers). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured Q&A and explicit “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages) so AI can cite Thomson Reuters directly for comparison and pricing-evaluation prompts rather than relying mostly on third parties.
Based on audit of thomsonreuters.com · May 5, 2026