[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Acquia
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

64

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

64

across 16 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Acquia is strongly positioned to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial G2 presence (1089+ reviews on G2) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., Acquia vs Pantheon). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-crawlable structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure pricing + key product pages are fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can quote specifics for “Acquia pricing” and “Acquia vs competitor” prompts.

Based on audit of acquia.com · May 10, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy