AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in HR
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals69/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
93
across 73 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 57 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in HR
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Achievers.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (notably ~9,599 G2 reviews) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Achievers vs Reward Gateway). The highest-risk query pattern is conversion-stage “pricing” queries: the pricing page is explicitly “Get custom pricing” (no public tiers/prices), which limits AI engines’ ability to answer “how much does Achievers cost?” with crawlable specifics.
Based on audit of achievers.com · Oct 4, 2026