[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Abnormalsecurity
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

52

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 98 prompts

AI Share of Voice

2%

across 80 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
68 brand-level
Cited0%0/68
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited71%10/14
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors1.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited75%6/8
Share of voice58%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited50%4/8
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors2.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Abnormalsecurity is visible in

1
  • Cloud Securitynot yet measured→

Executive summary

Abnormal AI is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage prompts via its G2 presence (65 reviews, 4.8★) and enterprise credibility signals (Gartner Peer Insights page exists; Abnormal is referenced as a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader in a first-party PDF). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/ensure crawlable first-party comparison and pricing content on abnormalsecurity.com (especially for “How does Abnormal AI compare to Proofpoint?” / “How does Abnormal AI compare to Mimecast?” and “How much does Abnormal AI cost?”), because current web search did not surface first-party /vs- or /compare-style pages or a public tiered pricing page.

Based on audit of abnormalsecurity.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy