AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in SaaS Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 164 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 164 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in SaaS Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Trelica is a B2B SaaS product (SaaS spend/management & access governance) and already has meaningful AI-citation inputs from G2 and Capterra. The biggest risk to appearing in evaluation-stage AI answers (especially “Trelica vs X” and “Trelica pricing”) is missing/unclear first-party crawlable comparison + pricing surfaces; the highest-ROI fix is to publish SSR, indexable first-party evaluation pages (brand-led “Trelica vs Competitor” and a tiered pricing page) that AI engines can cite directly.
Based on audit of trelica.com · Aug 21, 2026